TESTEX: A TOOL FOR ASSESSING METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY AND REPORTING QUALITY IN PHYSICAL EXERCISE TRAINING STUDIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13766103Keywords:
Physical exercise, Systematic review, Checklist, Evidence-based clinical practiceAbstract
Assessment of the quality of studies indicates scientific credibility and helps to make a preliminary classification of results, ensuring that studies address the issues and the particularity of the evidence in the best way. Several tools have been proposed in the literature to evaluate clinical trials. However, not all criteria are applicable to physical exercise training studies. In this sense, the objective of this study is to present a Portuguese version of the Tool for the assessment of Study qualiTy and reporting in EXercise (TESTEX) scale, a specific scale in the area of exercise science. In this study, the creation process and common criteria for methodological and reporting quality that make up the scale are presented. TESTEX was designed by experts in the field exclusively for evaluating the quality and reporting of exercise training studies. This is a 15-point scale, which is divided into two blocks: 5 points for the methodological quality of the study and 10 points for the quality of the report. Some of these criteria are: analysis by intention to treat, monitoring of activities in the control group(s), relative intensity of exercise kept constant, characteristics of exercise volume and energy expenditure, etc. The presentation of the TESTEX scale, in the Portuguese version, should serve both researchers, when carrying out clinical trials and systematic reviews, and professionals in the area of exercise science, as support in evaluating studies in their clinical practice.
Downloads
References
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE. Chapter 7 - General Principles of Exercise Prescription. Em: THOMPSON, W. R.; GORDON, N. F.; PESCATELLO, L. S. (Eds.). ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 8. ed. Philadelphia: American College of Sports Medicine, 2010. p. 380.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. APA Dictionary of Psychology - clinical marker. Disponível em: <https://dictionary.apa.org/>. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2023.
BAAR, J.; TANNOCK, I. Analyzing the same data in two ways: a demonstration model to illustrate the reporting and misreporting of clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, v.7, n.7, p.969–978, 1989.
BARROSO, W. K. S. et al. Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial – 2020. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, v.116, n.3, p.516-658, 2021.
BEGG, C. Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement. JAMA, v.276, n.8, p.637, 1996.
BLAND, M. Directory of randomisation (randomization) software and services. Disponível em: <https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/guide/randsery.htm>. Acesso em: 27 jan. 2023.
BOUTRON, I. et al. CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. Annals of Internal Medicine, v.167, n.1, p.40, 2017.
CHAN, L.; HEINEMANN, A. W.; ROBERTS, J. Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, v.68, n.2, p.127-129, 2014.
DENNETT, R. et al. Adherence and drop-out in randomized controlled trials of exercise interventions in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, v.43, 2020.
DIJKERS, M. P.; MILLIS, S. R. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication as a Measure of Intervention Reporting Quality: Rasch Analysis. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, v.2, n.3, p.100055, 2020.
EDWARDS, T. et al. Exercise training improves participation in persons with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Health Science, v.11, n.3, p.393-402, 2022.
EHLERS, D. K. et al. Contamination by an Active Control Condition in a Randomized Exercise Trial. PLOS ONE, v.11, n.10, p.e0164246, 2016.
EUROPEAN PATIENTS’ ACADEMY ON THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION. Quasi-randomised trial. Disponível em: <https://toolbox.eupati.eu/glossary/quasi-randomised-trial/>. Acesso em: 27 jan. 2023.
JADAD, A. R. et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials, v.17, n.1, p. 1-12, 1996.
LOURENÇO, C. L. M. Treinamento baseado em exergames sobre parâmetros hemodinâmicos em adultos: análise de efeitos e dropouts. Tese (Doutorado em Educação Física) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2022.
MAGILL, N. et al. A scoping review of the problems and solutions associated with contamination in trials of complex interventions in mental health. BMC Medical Research Methodology, v.19, n.1, p.4, 2019.
MAHER, C. G. et al. Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials. Physical Therapy, v.83, n.8, p.713-721, 2003.
MCCAMBRIDGE, J.; WITTON, J.; ELBOURNE, D. R. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v.67, n.3, p.267-277, 2014.
MORICE, V. RandoWeb, an online randomization tool for clinical trials. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, v.107, n.2, p.308-314, 2012.
O’CONNOR, C. M. et al. Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. JAMA, v.301, n.14, p.1439-1450, 2009.
PERRIER-MELO, R. J. et al. Efeito Agudo do Exercício Intervalado versus Contínuo sobre a Pressão Arterial: Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, v.115, n.1, p.5-14, 2020.
PRADO, A. K. G.; DELEVATTI, R. S.; MONTEIRO, E. P. Revisões sistemáticas para o campo de pesquisa em exercício físico e saúde: um framework de definições, aplicações e guia básico para elaboração. Corpoconsciência, v.26, n.3, p.86-112, 2022.
SCHMIDT, J. A. et al. Attrition in an Exercise Intervention: A Comparison of Early and Later Dropouts. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, v.48, n.8, p.952-960, 1 ago. 2000.
SCHULZ, K. F.; GRIMES, D. A. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. Lancet (London, England), v.359, n.9306, p.614–618, 2002.
SMART, N. A. et al. Validation of a new tool for the assessment of study quality and reporting in exercise training studies: TESTEX. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, v.13, n.1, p.9-18, 2015.
SONIS, J.; JOINES, J. The quality of clinical trials published in The Journal of Family Practice, 1974-1991. The Journal of Family Practice, v.39, n.3, p.225–235, 1994.
TAI, S. S.; ILIFFE, S. Considerations for the design and analysis of experimental studies in physical activity and exercise promotion: advantages of the randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine, v.34, n.3, p.220-224, 2000.
VALENZUELA, P. L. et al. Effects of physical exercise on physical function in older adults in residential care: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. The Lancet Healthy Longevity, v.4, n.6, p.e247-e256, 2023.
VANCAMPFORT, D. et al. Dropout from exercise randomized controlled trials among people with anxiety and stress-related disorders: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Journal of Affective Disorders, v.282, p.996-1004, 2021.
WHITING, P. et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v.69, p.225-234, 2016.
WHITING, P. et al. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v.69, p.225-34, 2016.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Camilo Luis Monteiro Lourenço, Ciro Oliveira Queiroz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Cenas Educacionais (Educational Scenes - CEDU) implies the transfer, by the authors, of the publication rights. The copyright for the manuscripts published in this journal is the author(s), with CEDU rights over the first publication. Authors(s) may only use the same results in other publications by explicitly indicating CEDU as the means of the original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License license apply to the material published in this journal, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original publication is correctly cited.
This work is licensed with a License 