LANGUAGE AND LENGUA Y POLÍTICA
DIÁLOGOS TRANSVERSALES COGNITIVO-AFECTIVOS EN LA ESFERA PÚBLICA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53500/missangas.v4i8.17486Palabras clave:
Lengua Política, Transversalidades Cognitivo-Afectivas, Formación de Opinión, Identidad Política, Polarización PolíticaResumen
Este estudio tiene como objetivo investigar la relación entre la lengua política y las transversalidades cognitivo-afectivas en la esfera pública. A través de un enfoque cualitativo, que combina análisis documental, análisis de discursos y revisión bibliográfica, se busca comprender cómo las estrategias retóricas, las emociones despertadas, el uso de términos y narrativas políticas, la polarización y la construcción de la identidad política influyen en la formación de opiniones, los comportamientos políticos y el mantenimiento o cuestionamiento de las estructuras de poder en la sociedad. El corpus de análisis consistirá en discursos políticos de líderes políticos, declaraciones públicas, entrevistas, debates y campañas electorales, representando diferentes contextos políticos e ideológicos. El análisis de los discursos se realizará utilizando un enfoque crítico, identificando los elementos discursivos que despiertan emociones y generan conexiones afectivas con el público, así como aquellos que refuerzan la división y el antagonismo entre diferentes grupos políticos. La revisión bibliográfica abarcará áreas como lingüística, ciencia política, comunicación y estudios culturales, buscando fundamentos teóricos para comprender el lenguaje político y sus repercusiones. Los resultados se analizarán a la luz de la literatura revisada, identificando tendencias, patrones y conclusiones relevantes.
Descargas
Citas
BOYD, D.; ELLISON, N. B. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, v. 13, n. 1, p. 210-230, 2008.
BUTLER, J. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.
CASTELLS, M. Networks of indignation and hope: social movements in the age of the internet. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2012.
CHOMSKY, Noam. Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. Nova Iorque: Seven Stories Press, 1991.
CHOUliARAKI, L.; FAIRCLOUGH, N. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.
ENLI, G.; SKOGERBØ, E. Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics: Twitter and Facebook as Arenas for Political Communication. Information, Communication & Society, v. 16, n. 5, p. 757-774, 2013.
FAIRCLOUGH, N. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.
FAIRCLOUGH, N. Language and Power. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015.
FOUCAULT, M. The Order of Discourse. São Paulo: Loyola Editions, 2014.
FRASER, N. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the "Postsocialist" Condition. New York: Routledge, 1997.
GOLDER, M.; STRAMSKI, J. Ideological Segregation among Online Collaborators: Evidence from Wikipedians. Social Science Quarterly, v. 98, n. 1, p. 163-187, 2017.
GRICE, H. P. Logic and conversation. In: COLE, P.; MORGAN, J. L. (Eds.). Syntax and Semantics. Volume 3: Speech Acts. Nova York: Academic Press, 1975.
HAWKINS, K. et al. The Mobilization of Resentment: Populism, Polarization, and the Politics of Emotion. British Journal of Political Science, v. 49, n. 4, p. 1045-1070, 2019.
HOOKS, B. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge, 2015.
JOHNSON, M. A. The Power of Political Language: How Rhetoric Shapes Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
JOHNSON, Mark. Online Politics: Embracing New Possibilities or Reinforcing Old Divides? Political Science Quarterly, v. 135, n. 1, 2020.
KING JR., M. L. I Have a Dream. Available at: http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkihaveadream.htm. 1963. Accessed: 22 May 2023.
KRUIKEMEIER, S. et al. Using Twitter to Mobilize Protest Action: Online Mobilization Patterns and Action Repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi Movements. Information, Communication & Society, v. 22, n. 2, p. 162-181, 2019.
LAKOFF, G. Don't Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2004.
LILLEKER, D. G.; JACKSON, N. Towards an Information Age Electoral Manifesto: A Road Map for Digital Election Communication Research. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, v. 13, n. 2, p. 184-196, 2016.
MAIA, R. P. The Political Language of Feminism: The Case of the Women for Peace Movement. Journal of Feminist Studies, v. 26, n. 1, p. 177-199, 2018.
MARCUS, G. E. et al. Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization. American Journal of Political Science, v. 62, n. 1, p. 34-49, 2018.
MATEUS, S. et al. Electoral Discourse in the 2015 Portuguese Legislative Elections: A Content Analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, v. 17, n. 2, p. 171-191, 2018.
MUTZ, D. C. Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 115, n. 19, p. E4330-E4339, 2018.
NUSSBAUM, M. C. Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
OBAMA, B. Democratic National Convention Keynote Address. 2004. Available in: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2012/06/28/president-obama-iowa-then-and-now. Accessed: 18 May 2023.
PERELMAN, C. Treatise on Argumentation: The New Rhetoric. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009.
PETERSEN, M. B. et al. Trumping Hate? How Threats of Violent Consequences Shape Support for Donald Trump. Journal of Experimental Political Science, v. 6, n. 4, p. 312-319, 2019.
SMITH, J. Political Narratives and the Production of Legitimacy: Discourse, Identity, and Power in US Congressional Debates. New York: Routledge, 2018.
SMITH, Jane. Emotional Politics: How Feelings Shape the Political Sphere. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
SOUSA, C. S. A. de. The construction of political identity: contributions from Political Psychology. Psychology & Society, v. 31, e181475, 2019.
SOUSA, Pedro. Polarization and Populism: A Linguistic Perspective. Discourse & Society, v. 30, n. 1, 2019.
SUNSTEIN, C. R. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.
TINDALE, C. W. Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
TUFEKCI, Z. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.
VAN DIJK, T. A. Discourse and Power. São Paulo: Context, 2008.
VAN HAUWAERT, S. M.; KROUWEL, A. The Effect of Online Populism and Political Sophistication on Euroscepticism: Evidence from a Dutch Online Panel. European Journal of Political Research, v. 59, n. 2, p. 344-366, 2020.
ZÚÑIGA, H. G. et al. Emotional News, Issue Importance, and Political Participation. Communication Research, v. 44, n. 1, p. 84-107, 2017.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Os artigos publicados na revista Missangas são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores e não refletem, necessariamente, o pensamento dos editores.